PHI101

An Introduction to Philosophy (RLL style) Week 10 – God 2 (Atheism) – Part 1: Introduction – Are You God?

by

What if the God we believe in is a mirror of ourselves? The projection critique suggests that the image of God we carry often aligns with our values, fears, and needs. From ancient gods to modern-day life coaches, we project our desires, intuitions, and hopes onto a figure we imagine to be greater than ourselves. Philosophy invites us to examine our belief and ask: which parts of our God come from tradition, fear, love, and which come from us? Even if God exists, our ideas about God are still human artifacts—and if not, belief is still one of our most powerful ways of understanding ourselves.

Read the letter →

An Introduction to Philosophy (RLL style) Week 09 – God 1 (Theism) – Part 6: What’s love got to do with it?

by

Love isn’t a necessity for the universe to function, but it persists anyway. It disrupts the cold efficiency of survival and adds something deeper, more tender, to the story of existence. Metaphysics and philosophy ask whether love is a fluke of chemistry or a clue that the universe is more than machinery—it might be the very force that holds the system together, a source of connection, meaning, and goodness that can’t be explained away.

Read the letter →

An Introduction to Philosophy (RLL style) Week 09 – God 1 (Theism) – Part 5: Feeling lucky?

by

Pascal’s wager isn’t about proving God’s existence—it’s about recognizing that life is already a gamble. Whether we believe or not, we’re staking our time, values, and energy on something. Pascal argues that, given the stakes, betting on God is the most rational choice because it offers the highest possible payoff with the least risk. Philosophy invites us to consider: what are you already betting on, and what do you stand to gain or lose?

Read the letter →

An Introduction to Philosophy (RLL style) Week 09 – God 1 (Theism) – Part 4: Who put this together?

by

The teleological argument invites us to consider purpose in the universe. When we see design, we assume a designer. Whether it’s the intricacy of the eye or the precision of the physical constants, the universe seems to behave as if it’s aiming toward something. But does this point to a creator, or just a vast system of function? Philosophy asks: if the universe is designed, then for what? Is it for life, for consciousness, or for something else entirely?

Read the letter →

An Introduction to Philosophy (RLL style) Week 09 – God 1 (Theism) – Part 3: Which came first – the chicken or the God?

by

The cosmological argument begins with an undeniable intuition: everything that begins has a cause. From the origins of the universe to the first domino falling, there must be a first cause – a push that set everything else in motion. This first cause, while not necessarily a personal deity, is where we begin to speak of “God.” The argument doesn’t prove a personality or intention; it simply points to the necessity of something that began the chain. The question is: what does that uncaused cause look like?

Read the letter →

An Introduction to Philosophy (RLL style) Week 09 – God 1 (Theism) – Part 1: Introduction: Where do babies come from?

by

existence. Philosophy of religion asks us to pause before the doctrines and definitions, and return to the moment of awe that first gave rise to the word. Before belief, before systems, before certainty, we were simply standing at the edge of understanding, asking: Why is there something instead of nothing?

Read the letter →

An Introduction to Philosophy (RLL style) Week 08 – Metaphysics 5 (Metaphysical Libertarianism) – Part 7: Summary: What, me worry?

by

The tension between free will and determinism may not be a dichotomy at all. Compatibilism invites us to see both forces as part of the same unfolding process, rather than opposing forces. Instead of fighting for one or the other, we can embrace the truth that we are the dance itself – not separate from the universe, but a dynamic part of it. Philosophy invites us to live fully in that dance, where choice and causality coexist in fluid, unpredictable harmony.

Read the letter →

An Introduction to Philosophy (RLL style) Week 08 – Metaphysics 5 (Metaphysical Libertarianism) – Part 6: What does God look like?

by

Genesis tells us humanity is made in the “image of God,” but what if that image isn’t physical? What if it’s the power to create from nothing, to choose beyond the constraints of cause and effect? Metaphysical libertarianism suggests that the truest form of freedom – the ability to decide, to act outside the law of causality – is the closest we come to expressing divinity. Philosophy invites us to notice those moments when we create, unbidden, and realize that in those flashes, we reflect the image of the Creator.

Read the letter →

An Introduction to Philosophy (RLL style) Week 08 – Metaphysics 5 (Metaphysical Libertarianism) – Part 5: Are you a flesh-bot?

by

If we are merely following a script, then rebellion becomes impossible. Metaphysical libertarianism argues that true freedom is found in the ability to step outside the prescribed pattern, to make choices that defy the “puppet strings.” Even if freedom is imperfect, it’s real when we break the chain and act beyond the limits we’ve known. Philosophy doesn’t promise us perfect choices, but it invites us to make those imperfect, free choices again and again.

Read the letter →

An Introduction to Philosophy (RLL style) Week 08 – Metaphysics 5 (Metaphysical Libertarianism) – Part 4: Can you touch a thought?

by

What if free will isn’t just about choosing between pre-determined options? What if, in rare moments, we make choices that break the chain of cause and effect entirely? In metaphysical libertarianism, these uncaused decisions—like a magician pulling something out of nowhere—offer a glimpse of true freedom, where choice exists outside the expected, outside the pattern, and simply is.

Read the letter →