Atheism in the 21st Century

An Introduction to Philosophy (RLL style) Week 10 – God 2 (Atheism) – Part 7: Summary – Heads or tails?

by

After everything we’ve explored, there’s no clear answer. No airtight proof for or against God. Reasonable people, standing on opposite sides of the same question, each convinced they’re being honest. At the core, we’re not theists or atheists as much as we are agnostics with preferences. Faith doesn’t need certainty—doubt is its companion. The opposite of faith is not doubt, but knowledge—the kind that closes the conversation. Instead, we engage in abduction reasoning, trying to make sense of incomplete evidence. Some see God in the universe. Others don’t. Different stories, same data. The question of God might not be about solving a math problem but about how we reason, what we fear, what we hope, and the uncertainty we can live with.

Read the letter →

An Introduction to Philosophy (RLL style) Week 10 – God 2 (Atheism) – Part 6: What has God done for you lately?

by

We keep looking for proof of God, hoping for a sign, a miracle. But miracles always come with alternative explanations—remission, coincidence, intervention, or just plain luck. What we call a miracle often depends more on what we already believe than on what actually happened. If God is acting in the world, why are the miracles so selective, so personal, and so ambiguous? A God who could make things clear, but doesn’t, begins to look indistinguishable from one who isn’t there at all. Atheism, for some, doesn’t come from hostility, but from exhaustion—from waiting, hoping, and hearing nothing back. Why is evidence so hard to find? And if God doesn’t exist, why are humans so good at finding meaning anyway?

Read the letter →

An Introduction to Philosophy (RLL style) Week 10 – God 2 (Atheism) – Part 5: Do you believe in Santa Claus?

by

Freud suggested that religion, much like the story of Santa Claus, isn’t necessarily a harmful lie, but an illusion born of need. It provides structure to chaos, comfort in the face of an unpredictable world, and offers a cosmic parent figure to protect us. Religion, then, is a psychological shelter—something that helps us cope with our existential fears. As societies evolve, the gods evolve with them—goddesses became gods, and the authority of the divine mirrored shifts in social power. Freud’s sharp insight: belief in God isn’t always about truth—it’s about reassurance. But if God were invented, not discovered, what does that say about the universe, and about ourselves?

Read the letter →

An Introduction to Philosophy (RLL style) Week 10 – God 2 (Atheism) – Part 4: Have you stopped beating your wife?

by

The free will defense, often cited by believers to explain the problem of evil, sounds comforting at first: evil exists because God gave us the freedom to choose. But this reasoning quickly unravels when we consider that free will is selectively interrupted by miracles, prayers, and divine intervention. Why, then, does God intervene sometimes and not others? Additionally, much suffering is not a result of human choice—natural disasters, diseases, birth defects—so the free will defense cannot explain natural evil. And in heaven, a place of perfection, free will seems unnecessary for goodness. The defense falters when we confront the reality of suffering and the fact that, often, telling the grieving that pain is “necessary” for a greater good feels dismissive, not loving. Maybe, the honest response to suffering is not explanation, but humility and presence.

Read the letter →

An Introduction to Philosophy (RLL style) Week 10 – God 2 (Atheism) – Part 3: Have you ever been in pain?

by

Pain doesn’t ask permission. It doesn’t care about belief. It just is. The traditional view of God—powerful, all-knowing, and good—collides with the reality of suffering, leading us to ask: If God could intervene, why does so much pain remain untouched? The problem of evil isn’t a theological trick; it’s a question born from love. It’s the refusal to accept suffering as just the way things are. Sometimes, atheism begins with grief, with the painful recognition that a loving God who doesn’t intervene looks eerily like one who isn’t there at all. So, what do we do with a universe where pain is real, often undeserved, and the most compassionate response isn’t explanation—but presence?

Read the letter →

An Introduction to Philosophy (RLL style) Week 10 – God 2 (Atheism) – Part 2: Does God have dissociative identity disorder?

by

If God were a universal, fixed reality, why is there such discord over God’s nature? The contradictions within religious belief—peace and holy war, mercy and vengeance—are normalized. What we believe about God is often determined by where and when we were born, shaped by culture, language, and history. A God who deeply cares about being known correctly would leave less room for confusion. So the real question is: are we projecting different gods based on our geography, or is God truly fragmented across cultures?

Read the letter →

An Introduction to Philosophy (RLL style) Week 10 – God 2 (Atheism) – Part 1: Introduction – Are You God?

by

What if the God we believe in is a mirror of ourselves? The projection critique suggests that the image of God we carry often aligns with our values, fears, and needs. From ancient gods to modern-day life coaches, we project our desires, intuitions, and hopes onto a figure we imagine to be greater than ourselves. Philosophy invites us to examine our belief and ask: which parts of our God come from tradition, fear, love, and which come from us? Even if God exists, our ideas about God are still human artifacts—and if not, belief is still one of our most powerful ways of understanding ourselves.

Read the letter →