US: 250 Years Later – Part 60: God

In 1776, God was woven directly into America’s understanding of itself. Faith shaped public life, political language, personal identity, and the belief that history itself unfolded under divine guidance. Two hundred and fifty years later, spirituality exists within a far more diverse landscape of religions, personal practices, philosophies, and private reflections. This letter follows America’s changing relationship with God and asks whether the deepest human search has ever truly changed… or simply found new languages through which to speak.

Read the letter →

US: 250 Years Later – Part 20: Church

In 1776, church was not merely a place people attended. It was atmosphere itself, shaping time, politics, morality, and community even among people who never formally joined congregations. Two hundred and fifty years later, church exists in sanctuaries, livestreams, podcasts, storefronts, and digital spaces, still asking ancient questions about meaning, belonging, and hope in an increasingly fragmented world.

Read the letter →

An Introduction to Philosophy (RLL style) Week 10 – God 2 (Atheism) – Part 7: Summary – Heads or tails?

After everything we’ve explored, there’s no clear answer. No airtight proof for or against God. Reasonable people, standing on opposite sides of the same question, each convinced they’re being honest. At the core, we’re not theists or atheists as much as we are agnostics with preferences. Faith doesn’t need certainty—doubt is its companion. The opposite of faith is not doubt, but knowledge—the kind that closes the conversation. Instead, we engage in abduction reasoning, trying to make sense of incomplete evidence. Some see God in the universe. Others don’t. Different stories, same data. The question of God might not be about solving a math problem but about how we reason, what we fear, what we hope, and the uncertainty we can live with.

Read the letter →

An Introduction to Philosophy (RLL style) Week 10 – God 2 (Atheism) – Part 6: What has God done for you lately?

We keep looking for proof of God, hoping for a sign, a miracle. But miracles always come with alternative explanations—remission, coincidence, intervention, or just plain luck. What we call a miracle often depends more on what we already believe than on what actually happened. If God is acting in the world, why are the miracles so selective, so personal, and so ambiguous? A God who could make things clear, but doesn’t, begins to look indistinguishable from one who isn’t there at all. Atheism, for some, doesn’t come from hostility, but from exhaustion—from waiting, hoping, and hearing nothing back. Why is evidence so hard to find? And if God doesn’t exist, why are humans so good at finding meaning anyway?

Read the letter →